America Out Loud PULSE: Epidemic of Loneliness

From my America Out Loud Pulse podcast with Dr. Renée Kohanski –https://www.americaoutloud.com/the-government-imposed-epidemic-of-loneliness-study/

The Surgeon General recently published a detailed study of loneliness in the United States. Even before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately half of U.S. adults reported experiencing measurable levels of loneliness. Social isolation and loneliness increase the risk for premature death, heart disease, stroke by some 30 percent—or the same as smoking 15 cigarettes per day. Socially isolated older adults have a higher chance of developing dementia than their peers.

A medical study cited in Surgeon General’s report struck me as really rich: “the lack of social connection may increase susceptibility to viruses and respiratory illness.”  Where was the reliance on this report by the “experts” when they locked us in our homes for Covid?

The federal government’s solution to this deadly epidemic is its plan to establish a “National Strategy to Advance Social Connection”. Maybe this is exactly what is wrong. Since the Great Society programs in the 1960s, the federal government’s ever-expanding regulation of our lives has encouraged us to look to the government for help instead of each other.

The National Strategy includes “Cultivating a Culture of Connection”. But then why do Washington D.C.’s power-brokers, the media, and various hustlers of all colors insist on telling us that white people have inborn bias and manipulate us to shunning those who are not of our skin color or sexual preference? “Culture of connection” my eye!

And one more thing. It is curious that simultaneously artificial intelligence is promoted as the next great best thing in medicine—even replacing mental health therapists. Ironically, research has shown that the patient physician relationship can be more therapeutic than some medications. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t want to talk to a machine. Even the drive through at Jack-in-the-Box has real people behind the microphone.

My guest and I will discuss these things and a whole lot more today.

Thinking Out Loud: Pravda

We have a mentally challenged, corrupt vapid zombie running for President of our democratic republic. The media refuse to report about it. Not to mention that the real presidential candidate is a despicable corrupt politician in her own right.

The First Amendment’s freedom of the press and speech clause enhances our freedoms through flooding the “marketplace of ideas” with unlimited information. There was a time when the law wrestled with censorship of hard-core pornography. Now the media are censoring political viewpoints.

Although media outlets are not government entities, the charge of the media is to relay information, not indoctrinate. In a few short years our media — the voice of the people — have devolved into Pravda. For those who don’t remember the Soviet Union (USSR), Pravda (meaning “truth”) was the USSR’s Communist Party newspaper that disseminated only Party-approved information.

Yesterday the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation grilled the CEOs of Google, Twitter, and Facebook regarding their bias against conservative posts. Predictably, some Democratic legislators seemed to think the censorship of conservatives was acceptable. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) indeed wanted more — against conservatives only!

Suppression of free speech is a step in the long march to socialism. With socialism the state owns and operates all capital. It seems antithetical that some corporate shills (including big tech, print and television media) support Joe Biden, the Communist Chinese puppet. Think again. Biden’s platform includes re-instituting regulations, raising the minimum wage, and levying high taxes. Such policies tend to drive smaller companies out of business. With the competition eliminated, the surviving big corporations assume they will be the “chosen ones” for the government-owned means of production. After all, the government deemed the big boys “essential,” thus allowed them to operate at full throttle during the Covid lockdowns.

Remember who is really essential: you. Speak up and speak out while you still can.

“As to the evil which results from a censorship, it is impossible to measure it, for it is impossible to tell where it ends.” Jeremy Bentham, English philosopher (1748-1832)

What is Worse: Going Viral or Verbal Quarantine?

As the death toll and cases of 2019- nCoV (aka novel coronavirus) infection rises, our curiosity increases as to the epidemic’s when, why, where, and how. Is the new virus naturally occurring, animal to human transmission, a bioweapon? “Official stories” aside, the world wide information highway is our best available tool to look for answers. The truth will eventually be revealed. As of the first week in February, folks are being quarantined as some 4,000 cases a day are diagnosed. And the physician who warned officials early on was verbally quarantined as a rumor monger, now has died of the disease.

Censorship has consequences not only for public safety but for shrinking the marketplace of ideas. Thus, with all the issues about which to educate ourselves, we should all be outraged at Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to censor “disinformation” on social media. Now her plan to “create civil and criminal penalties for knowingly disseminating false information” is limited to influencing elections. But once acquiesced to, censorship tends to metastasize to other areas. The paternalistic powers that be, worried that the unwashed masses will not be able to discern conspiracy theories from alternate positions, will determine your opinion for you.

Social media, while ubiquitous and public, are private speech. For years, social media platforms have “moderated” content using opaque algorithms that are finally coming to light. While safeguards were designed to eliminate dangerous or abusive content, certain viewpoints are more likely to be censored by Twitter and Facebook than others, perverting the marketplace of ideas.

Censorship has now infiltrated our routine social interactions under the guise of offensiveness. There was a time when the seven words you cannot say on television were blatant profanities. Now it’s like whack a mole trying to keep up with what we are allowed to say not only online but in polite mixed company. California tried to pass a law where someone using “he” instead of “she” could face a $1,000 fine and up to a year in jail. It’s gotten to the place where animal lovers are offended if we call our dogs “pets” rather than our companions.

Most importantly, political opinions should go viral, not be quarantined. Many folks with opinions differing from those of the tribal chieftains find themselves whispering in dark corners like drug dealers. Actually, drug dealers in San Francisco have it better: they can sell drugs openly on the street without recourse. The LGBT tribe attempted to quarantine gay conservatives who did not fit the mold by cancelling scheduled #WalkAway town hall venues citing #WalkAway as a hate group. The hate? Encouraging LGBT folks to leave the Democrat party. Undeterred, they move the town halls to the streets. Scott Presler, a conservative gay man who is cleaning up inner cities across America, concludes that “what the left fears most is other people seeing that we exist.”

We have presidential candidates with disparate views from socialism to freedom from government regulations. We want Bernie Sanders to explain why public ownership of utilities, banks and major industries is something that would improve our lives in the long term and how that is consistent with our Constitution. Or Pete Buttigieg to defend abolishing the electoral college. What we don’t want is the power brokers quarantining those who do not bow to their orthodoxy. Why is it that CNN excluded Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (who is known for not being influenced by special interest groups) from its town halls despite her having higher poll numbers than participants Andrew Yang and Deval Patrick? Why did the Democratic National Committee change the debate rules for Michael Bloomberg but not for Julian Castro or Cory Booker?

When it comes to medical care, physicians want to be free to discuss all sides of any issue with patients. If a physician believes mutilating young children at the altar of transgenderism is wrong, she should be free to say so. If a physician wants to discuss the pros and cons of vaccination with his patients, his license should not be at risk.

If some physicians believe that single payer health care is wrong for the country’s medical care, we want a discussion—not to be labelled a heartless, cruel ignoramus. If we do not want medical decisions to be made by bureaucrats, do not want rationing, and do not want decreased medical innovation, we want the chance to present the facts. While rank partisanship keeps legislation that promotes personalized medical care from being brought to the House floor, Walmart and CVS are opening clinics staffed by nurse practitioners. We cannot let patients’ only options be big corporations or big government.

As Frederick Douglass said, “power concedes nothing without a demand…The limits of tyrants are proscribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress.” We cannot cede our personal power to the government. Surely the government has its Constitutional duties, but just like with containing the 2019-nCoV virus, we still must wash our own hands and cough into our own elbows.