You’re Old, You’re Sick, Get Over It

by Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.

Senior citizens, don’t be fooled. The federal government asserts that Medicare sets a high bar for medical care and we are lucky to have it. Not so. It does, however, claim a virtual monopoly on health insurance coverage for all eligible persons.

All citizens who receive Social Security or Railroad Retirement Board benefits automatically receive a Medicare Part A card in the mail around their 65th birthday. Part A covers hospital, hospice, and limited skilled nursing services. This entitlement has very long strings attached. If retirees disenroll from Medicare Part A they lose future Social Security benefits and must return all past benefits. Even working seniors enrolled in Medicare or collecting Social Security cannot participate in Health Savings Accounts (HSA)/high deductible health plans.

Most new Medicare eligibles also automatically receive a Part B card (coverage for physician services and outpatient injectables, particularly cancer medications). Part B is voluntary and recipients are advised they can send the card back if they want to opt out. Medicare warns that a late enrollment penalty awaits the tardy: the monthly premium for Part B may go up 10% for each full 12-month period that they could have had Part B, but didn’t sign up for it—in perpetuity.

Bullying aside, it sounds pretty good. But Medicare, whose expenditures are 15 per cent of the federal budget, faces financial challenges, mainly due to our aging population. When Medicare started life expectancy was 70 years. Now it is 78.8 years. In 2012, per person personal health-related spending for the 65 and older population was more than 5 times higher than spending per child and 3 times the spending per working-age person. The Medicare Board of Trustees 2015 report estimates that under current law the Medicare trust fund will become insolvent in 2030.

Enter the Medicare hospice benefit in 1982. Policymakers believed this program would lower costs by reducing “aggressive” end-of-life treatments. With hospice care, Medicare pays a daily rate for services to persons with life expectancies of 6 months or less who choose to forgo life-saving or potentially curative treatment for the presumed terminal illness and related conditions.

But Medicare hospice expenditures are rising. Realistically, it isn’t easy to predict who will live and who will die and when. Not only has the number of Medicare hospice patients with not immediately terminal conditions such as heart failure and dementia dramatically increased, 19 percent of such patients receive services for much longer than 6 months.

The renewed focus on Medicare cost containment has produced various suggestions, including vouchers, tax credits, extending income-based premiums, increasing the eligibility age, and allowing contributions to HSAs in retirement.

Expanding HSAs presents the best opportunity to regain real choice and control over our medical care consistent with one’s personal values.

Instead, a culture of hastening death has gradually evolved, disguised as “death with dignity.” First, California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Vermont have legal physician-assisted suicide, with 20 other states considering legalization. Second, when older folks fall ill, despite the uncertainty of medical prognosis, some families feel they are not merely offered hospice as a choice but are steered toward it. Third, disturbing news articles report hospice treatment plans for those who aren’t dying fast enough: “pain management” in terminal doses.

Finally, money talks. In the hospice program, if the patient goes to the hospital and the hospice “provider” (not one’s own physician) did not make the arrangements, the patient might be responsible for the entire cost of the hospital care. Additionally, the Affordable Care Act created a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The Institute investigates the effectiveness of various medical interventions, but is prohibited from treating “the life of an elderly, disabled, or terminally ill individual as of lower value than extending the life of an individual who is younger, nondisabled, or not terminally ill.” However, the data may be used to determine coverage and payment rates. The patient can choose a federally determined “low-value” service, but the cost would be prohibitive. And the low physician payment rates will ensure that physicians’ practices will not be actively seeking such patients. It is an empty choice.

One day in the hospital costs Medicare about $708. One day in hospice costs $183. One hundred twenty morphine tablets cost $20.88 retail. Health Savings Account money in the bank creates real options. But if you leave the choice up to the government, with a roll of the dice you could figuratively be in Jail rather than passing GO and getting another turn at life, just like in the game of Monopoly.


Dr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law. She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012.

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

More info about Dr. Marilyn Singleton

Let’s Not Replace Constitutionally Proper Elections With Mob Rule

by Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.

The goal of the recent sometimes-unruly protests over the election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States of America is unclear. Is it to make President-elect Trump preemptively resign? Is it to ensure that he never takes office—by any means necessary? Is it to exercise the protesters’ self-defined right to vandalize the property of others?

Of course, we’ve never had a flawed person as president. Not the progressive icon Woodrow Wilson who re-segregated the White House. Not the revered Franklin Roosevelt who herded Japanese citizens into internment camps. Not the two incredibly popular womanizers Bill Clinton and JFK. And we’ve never had a rock-star-Beyonce and F-word, N-word Jay Z at the White House of hyperbolic-story-telling president like Barack “if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor” Obama. And of course, there were no flaws in the Democratic candidate who never denounced the Democratic National Committee’s unfair treatment of Bernie Sanders or the heads up on questions in the primary debate.

Is the protestors’ beef that the election was not fair? There have been no reports of voter intimidation. Is the protestors’ beef that the election was not democratic? It seems the complaints about Mr. Trump are conflated with the meme ungraciously perpetrated by Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine in an effort to boost Hillary Clinton’s ego: she won more popular votes. That is a totally irrelevant, ignorant, and divisive statement perhaps meant to foment resentment and ill will.

Message to protesters: the candidates were campaigning for each state’s electoral votes (the number of congresspersons and both senators), the system set forth in our Constitution. The Electoral College treats the states as equal sovereignties and keeps large states from swallowing up the small states.

It is the fight for electoral votes rather than popular votes that results in no one ever having to campaign, for example, in deep dark blue California where the ballot offered the choice between two Democratic candidates for U.S. Senate. The skewed voting patterns of California’s 18 million registered voters could account for Clinton’s extra votes.

Majority rule sounds moral but majority rule is not automatically democratic. As Ben Franklin said, “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for dinner.”

Our country’s founders knew that the “divine right of the majority” was just as bad as rule by “the divine right of kings.” In Federalist No. 10, James Madison argued that direct democracies are “incompatible with personal security or the rights of property.” In a direct democracy, the individual, and any group of individuals who are in the minority, have no protection against the unlimited power of the majority. If the majority votes to take away your land, you lose your land. If the majority votes to outlaw your business, you lose your business.

Madison concluded that a representative democracy—which he called a “republic”—is preferable to direct democracy as a form of government. Madison reasoned that representatives would not be caught up in the heat of the moment of some passion-infused issue raised by a group. Our representatives would refine the views of the public and create laws designed to uphold the basic inalienable human rights consistent with democracy: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to a fair trial, protection against unwarranted intrusion by the government, and equal protection under the law.

Publius (either James Madison or Alexander Hamilton) noted in Federalist No. 55 that a republican government assumes that man’s virtuous nature outweighs our political jealousies. If that were not so, “nothing less than the chains of despotism can restrain them from destroying and devouring one another.”

Another safeguard against governmental abuse of power is our three separate branches of government that can change the acts of the other branches. Sadly, the federal government has morphed into a species of mob rule. Its pronouncements and regulations have ballooned, largely unknown to anyone but those who wrote them and the poor schnooks who must abide by them.

Many pundits are calling for president-elect Trump to decry the protests and tell the protestors to stop. Why would they listen to the person whom they despise? Where is Hillary Clinton’s voice of reason peddling love and kindness?

To echo Oprah Winfrey (whose equanimity outraged some protesters and Hollywood types), “Everybody, take a deep breath. Hope lives.


singletonDr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law. She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012.

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

More info about Dr. Marilyn Singleton

HIPAA, Hillary and Hype

By Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.

In watching Hillary Clinton campaign I’m reminded of a poem I learned in ninth grade: humorist Arthur Guiterman’s “On the Vanity of Earthly Greatness”:

The tusks that clashed in mighty brawls

Of mastodons, are billiard balls.

The sword of Charlemagne the Just

Is ferric oxide, known as rust.

The grizzly bear whose potent hug

Was feared by all, is now a rug.

Great Caesar’s bust is on my shelf,

And I don’t feel so well myself.

We came into this election cycle hearing that Hillary Clinton was going to be coronated the Democratic nominee for president. The queen is not to be defied. Worse yet, she actually believes the hype.

First, we have the Hillary is a trailblazer meme. Of course, the true trailblazer was Victoria Woodhull, the first female stockbroker on Wall Street, who ran for U.S. president in the Equal Rights Party in 1872 – well-before women could vote. And Senator Margaret Chase Smith ran in 1964, the first year in which any woman’s name was on the ballot as a candidate for President. (In the 19th century, voters cast tickets prepared by the parties rather than state-printed ballots). Smith was first woman to have her name be placed in nomination for the presidency at a major political party’s convention. There have been some 40 bold women who have launched presidential runs without the benefit of a political “machine” and a famous husband.

Then we have the demeaning battle cry that women should vote for Clinton merely because of her gender. Clinton grinned and vigorously applauded as Madeleine Albright said “there is a special place in hell for women who do not help other women.” Does this include Imelda Marcos or Isabel Perón? I suppose Hillary has assured her eternal damnation by not helping Michelle Bachman or Carly Fiorina.

Then there’s Clinton’s supporter, Georgia civil rights activist John Lewis’ rather convenient recollection from the 1960s. He said he never saw Bernie Sanders at freedom marches in the 1960s but he “met” the Clintons. Curious indeed, since according to Clinton herself, during high school (1963-65) she was a “Goldwater Girl,” and in college interned for Gerald Ford and worked for Nelson Rockefeller in his presidential nomination bid at the 1968 Republican convention. On the other hand, Bernie Sanders before his 1964 graduation from University of Chicago was the protest organizer for the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). In 1963 Sanders was convicted of resisting arrest during a demonstration against segregation in Chicago’s public schools.

And of course we have the infamous emails on the private server that was wiped clean. Clearly Clinton’s emails with sensitive diplomatic activity would be a target – particularly as she traveled throughout a sometimes hostile world. The intelligence community believes that dozens of Clinton’s emails contained classified material, including “top secret/SAP (special access program)” materials. Government computer breaches are not merely theoretical. The Office of Personnel Management and Department of Homeland Security hacks exposed sensitive data on thousands of federal workers.

Personal email servers generally are not covered by enterprise-grade data backup, archiving, and network security. Moreover, a personal server is outside the reach of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) disclosure requirements. The State Department Foreign Affairs Manual requires that custodians must keep “records that document the formulation and execution of basic policies and decisions and the taking of necessary actions; records that document important meetings; records that facilitate action by agency officials and their successors in office.”

As physicians, we value privacy and are held to high ethical and legal standards. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act’s HIPAA Security Rule requires that all electronic personal health information (ePHI) must be properly secured from unauthorized access, whether the data is at rest or in transit. Custodians as well as their business associates must perform yearly risk analyses for vulnerabilities in the administrative, physical, and technical safeguards. Stiff penalties await violators of HIPAA rules. Penalties range from up to $50,000 per violation for “reasonable cause” to a maximum of $1,500,000 per year and criminal charges which could result in jail time for “willful neglect.” Criminal prosecutions have occurred (for example, here, here, and here).

At the very least Clinton violated the Federal Records Act that prohibits willful concealment, removal, or destruction of government records, punishable by up to three years imprisonment.

If Hillary Clinton were a physician she’d be in prison. I hear the facility in Allenwood, Pennsylvania is particularly pleasant in the Spring.

To blindly jump on the Hillary inevitability bandwagon would prove that “the world is grown so bad that wrens make prey where eagles dare not perch.” I’d rather heed Margaret Chase Smith’s caution: “Honor is to be earned, not bought.”


 

singletonDr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

Despite being told, “they don’t take Negroes at Stanford”, she graduated from Stanford and earned her MD at UCSF Medical School.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton then completed two years of surgery residency at UCSF, followed by an anesthesia residency at Harvard’s Beth Israel Hospital.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton was first an instructor, then Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland before she returned to private practice in California.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law.  She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has conducted make-shift medical clinics in two rural villages in El Salvador.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012. (Audio version of the speech to AAPS doctors by Dr. Marilyn Singleton.)

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

Carly Fiorina, the Third Outsider

By Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.

Given that 75 percent of Americans think current government is corrupt, perhaps a bold outsider is the right person at the right time. Carly Fiorina’s articulate, focused, and fearless performances in the Republican debates elevated her from an also-ran to a real contender. Although there are no voting records to peruse, her current positions are consistent with those during her 2010 run against incumbent Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA). But whether Fiorina will make a good president is the relevant question.

Economy

Fiorina denounces crony capitalism, noting that big business and big government go hand in hand. She called the February 2009 stimulus package a “failure” and that the key to economic recovery is less government, taxation, and regulation. Fiorina supports creating additional tax breaks for small businesses and repealing the estate tax.

Foreign Policy

For a political outsider, Fiorina is credible and well versed on world affairs. She’s served on several relevant boards, including the External Advisory Board for the Central Intelligence Agency. With regard to the Palestinian/Israel conflict, she supports a two-state solution with Jerusalem as the undivided capital. Pursuant to our allies’ requests, to combat ISIL she would provide materiel to Jordan, intelligence to Egypt, and more weapons to the Kurds in northern Iraq. Fiorina would stop the Iran nuclear deal and verify actions before Iran sanctions are lifted.

Immigration

Although Fiorina approved of the DREAM Act, she cautioned that it was “putting the cart before the horse.” In her view, immigration reform should be passed in a series of bills with the number one priority of securing our porous border. She supports a pathway to legalization but not full citizenship since such immigrants have broken the law.

Education

Fiorina favors the standards set forth in No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top but with more local control. She believes these accountability and achievement goals are best met by policies that provide for vouchers, open enrollment, charter schools and career technical education.

Abortion

Fiorina supports a ban on abortions after 20 weeks gestation except in cases of rape, incest or danger to the life of the mother. During the second 2015 Republican debate Fiorina distinguished herself by passionately declaring that haggling over pricing of aborted body parts poorly reflected on the character of our nation.

Health Care

Since 2010 Fiorina has called for repeal of the Affordable Care Act, which she called a collaboration between big government and the health insurance companies trying to protect their franchises. However in 2013, she agreed with two ACA provisions: the individual mandate and the ban on discrimination by insurers against people with pre-existing conditions. Fiorina’s recipe for reform consists of encouraging competition in the health insurance market, reforming medical malpractice, increasing accessibility to community clinics, and increasing federal aid to states to administer high-risk pools to help the needy.

Hewlett Packard—Competence as a Chief Executive

Fiorina began her career as a receptionist at a small business and climbed up the corporate ladder to become the first woman CEO of a Fortune 20 company. Her success at increasing the market share of Lucent, AT&T’s networking equipment spinoff was marred by claims of questionable financial practices. Nonetheless, she was aggressively courted by the struggling Hewlett Packard to spur innovation and shake things up.

The tech bubble burst shortly after Fiorina joined HP. She streamlined operations, had a “shape up or ship out” mandate, and laid off some 30,000 American workers. To get more of the personal computer market share and better compete with IBM she spearheaded the $25 billion acquisition of Compaq in May 2002 – a move that was bitterly opposed by the founders’ sons. Revenues increased mainly due to the merger. On the positive side, HP increased its patents from 10,000 to 30,000, and Fiorina helped make HP a leader in charitable giving.

But during Fiorina’s five years as CEO her management style was criticized, the stock fell 49 percent, and ultimately the board of directors forced her to resign. But former director Tom Perkins notes that HP’s “ineffective and dysfunctional” board made life hard for its CEOs. Indeed, HP has had five CEOs since Fiorina’s 2005 departure.

Many technology CEOs now believe the Compaq merger and Fiorina’s “bold move” has been vindicated as it achieved her promise to created a worldwide technology powerhouse with top revenue positions in servers, PC and printers. Former Intel chairman Craig Barrett opined that the HP/Compaq merger was “an unqualified success.”

Fiorina defends her troubled HP tenure by asserting tough times call for tough calls for the overall health of the enterprise. Our country is ailing on many fronts. It will take more time and exposure to determine whether Fiorina’s corporate experience and views will sufficiently resonate with the electorate.


singletonDr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

Despite being told, “they don’t take Negroes at Stanford”, she graduated from Stanford and earned her MD at UCSF Medical School.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton then completed two years of surgery residency at UCSF, followed by an anesthesia residency at Harvard’s Beth Israel Hospital.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton was first an instructor, then Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland before she returned to private practice in California.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law.  She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has conducted make-shift medical clinics in two rural villages in El Salvador.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012. (Audio version of the speech to AAPS doctors by Dr. Marilyn Singleton.)

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

 

Presidential Candidates in the Year of the Sheep

Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.

Gong Hay Fat Choy! [Happy New Year!] The Chinese Year of the Sheep is upon us. Sheep are known for trying to make people happy and being loyal followers. Too many of our elected “leaders” have lived their careers in the Year of the Sheep.

This is also the year where potential presidential candidates surface. The candidates range from the anointed one, establishment insiders, and those pretending not to be insiders, to those on the fringe. All we now know is what the potential candidates have told us about themselves or what the media want us to know about them.

We have learned the hard way that policies are more than a catchy bumper sticker. Remember “Hope and Change”?

Hillary Clinton’s slogan thus far is “I Am Woman.” Clinton has yet to own to any responsibility in the Benghazi murders and HillaryCare trumps ObamaCare in the government takeover of medical care category. Her Wall Street connections are driving the anti-business crowd to urge non-candidate pro-federal regulation Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren to throw her hat in the ring.

Former Democratic Virginia senator Jim Webb is a self-described public servant, warrior, author, and filmmaker. He correctly notes that people want solutions, not rhetoric. His pitch is that he can bring us together, as he spent four years in the Reagan administration.

Former Florida governor Jeb Bush was indeed popular but increased spending and supports federal intervention in education. He said on ABC’s This Week that Republicans should stop trying to defund ObamaCare and instead let implementation of the law prove that it won’t work. Of course, by then it will be too late.

Wisconsin governor Scott Walker is known for budget cutting and standing up to public-sector unions. He did not buy into the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of Medicaid. Instead he reformed BadgerCare (Wisconsin’s Medicaid) by moving people out of BadgerCare onto the ACA’s marketplace. His goal was to get more people working and fewer people dependent on the government. The media has publicized Walker’s lack of a college degree and his 2010 scandal over apparently urging his employees to post comments promoting him and his record on news websites.

Governor Chris Christie was a breath of fresh air with his assertive no-nonsense style. But New Jersey is not in great economic shape, with high unemployment and a poor credit rating. While stating that he was “no fan of the Affordable Care Act”, Christie felt leadership dictated that he accept federal Medicaid funds to help the state’s low-income residents. After all, the federal government would pay the full cost of Medicaid expansion for three years and 90 percent of the cost after that. But how would he save money as the head of the federal government?

Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are engaging speakers and add some diversity. Rubio has said he will vote to defund the Affordable Care Act. Cruz’s conservative principles are considered solid and by some, extreme.

Having physicians in the mix is encouraging, but not dispositive. Remember Howard Dean. Senator Rand Paul to his credit has opened himself up to traditionally unfriendly crowds. He is clearly in favor of limited government, and against ObamaCare. Neurosurgeon and professor emeritus Ben Carson made it clear at the National Prayer Breakfast that he has no use for ACA. But his lack of political experience may haunt him as he speaks his mind in an unvarnished way.

Ohio two-term Ohio governor John Kasich supported Medicaid expansion under ACA even after the legislature issued a line item veto.

Indiana governor and former senator Mike Pence has a strong resume, and Indiana has a great economy. Pence pledged to reduce regulations but agreed to Medicaid expansion under the ACA.

Former CEO Carly Fiorina is relatively unknown, and Hewlett Packard did not exactly thrive under her stewardship.

Some retreads include Mike Huckabee, popular with social conservatives, who increased spending and taxes while governor of Arkansas, and former Texas governor Rick Perry, who performed miserably last time around.

Many others have expressed interest. The more choice the better.

Politics is not for other people; it pertains to us and has a palpable effect on our lives. For example, despite federal expenditures of $415 billion per year, Medicaid patients have decreased access to care, longer waiting times for appointments than privately insured patients, and more emergency room visits to receive non-urgent care.

Let’s make our New Year’s resolution to go beyond a superficial look at the candidates. With respect to American medicine, we will not tolerate a politician who would rather listen to a flock of railbirds enamored with regulatory control than meet with committed members of the medical community who have easily implemented alternatives to the current medical care delivery model.


 

singletonDr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law. She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012.

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

More info about Dr. Marilyn Singleton

Deceptive Political Debates Elicit Unproductive Emotions

Emotionitis: a Political Malady

By Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.

Today’s political debates are extremely polarized and emotional. One person’s charming, clever, and assertive is another’s manipulative, cunning, and ruthless.

Consider the opposing perspectives on some of the most important issues:

  • Did the politician lie or merely misspeak?
  • Is the NSA perpetrating an obscene invasion of privacy or deploying a crucial tool against terrorism?
  • Is supporting voter identification laws resurrecting Jim Crow or ensuring legitimate votes are not diluted by fraudulent votes?
  • Do federal regulations stifle business and entrepreneurship or do they ensure Americans’ safety?
  • Why is it racist to disagree with the policies of President Obama or Attorney General Holder, but reasonable to disagree with Condoleezza Rice or Clarence Thomas?
  • Why is interest in the possible long-term effects of Hillary Clinton’s brain concussion intrusive, sexist, and unfair, but delving into Sarah Palin’s medical records to determine if she had actually given birth to her new baby is manifestly valid? (I guess it’s a political crime to be petite.)
  • Have you cornered the market on compassion if you believe Medicaid provides good health care, or are you a heartless subhuman if you believe Medicaid traps lower income individuals in a two-tiered health system?

Marcus Aurelius said, “Everything we see is perspective and not the truth.” In 1880, William James, a Harvard physician, philosopher, and “father of psychology” observed, “As a rule we disbelieve all the facts and theories for which we have no use. A great many people think they are thinking when they are really rearranging their prejudices.”

To analyze why we cement our beliefs in the face of contrary facts, psychologist Leon Festinger proposed the theory of cognitive dissonance: people seek consistency in their beliefs and perceptions because it is uncomfortable to have inconsistent ideas. For example, you like President Obama, so how can you dislike ObamaCare?

One unconscious mechanism we use to ignore facts is “motivated reasoning.” Here, we process information such that the influence of our beliefs outweighs new facts in forming seemingly reasonable conclusions. In other words, our brain’s goal is not accuracy, but defense of beliefs.

Adding to the difficulty in changing our minds, we tend toward “confirmation bias,” i.e., listening only to those who confirm our preconceptions. Another psychological tool is post-purchase rationalization. Anyone who purchased a time-share or hot-off-the-shelf Betamax knows what that is.

Modern technology confirms Professor James’s observation. An Emory University study analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) found that the areas in the brain regulating emotion and conflict resolution light up when subjects were questioned about their political beliefs. The part of the brain most associated with reasoning was quiet.

Emotionitis and ideological divisiveness should never have been allowed to take over the healthcare reform debate. A good relationship with your doctor is just too important to health and peace of mind. And there are actually large areas of agreement.

A mere 19 percent of Americans say that they trust Washington “to do what is right” just about always or most of the time according to Pew Research Center.

Yet, while we think the government is made of incompetent self-serving fools, we trusted it with our health care system. Perhaps enough first-hand experience with grossly higher premiums, deductibles, and co-pays and limits on patients’ choice of physicians jolted people into reality. The support for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is at an all time low of 26 percent according to the latest Associated Press poll.

There is also almost universal agreement that American medicine has serious problems. The right approach would have been to seek dispassionate analysis of the causes instead of leaping into the Affordable Care Act.

Our system relies heavily on public and private third party payers and muscles out the one-on-one relationship between patient and doctor. ACA just makes it worse. ACA’s “health insurance” is not medical care—and it isn’t insurance either.

Real insurance—unlike ACA and most of pre-ACA coverage also—is affordable because it is designed to financially protect against catastrophes, not routine necessities. Individualized affordable medical care can be achieved through expansion of health savings accounts, direct pay (which cuts out third-party overhead), charity care, and major medical insurance.

We need to overcome our emotional attachment to the false promise of security through third-party coverage.


Dr. Marilyn SingletonDr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law. She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012.

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

More info about Dr. Marilyn Singleton


Cambodia and the Affordable Care Act

Change Is Not Always For The Better

by Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.,

Recently, I took a respite from my concerns about the Affordable Care Act, which I left simmering in the crockpot while I was re-visiting the Kingdom of Cambodia.

Most people visit Cambodia for a brief trip to Siem Reap to experience the magnificent ancient temples at Angkor Wat, the symbol adorning its flag. Some visit the capital city, Phnom Penh, to experience mass graves and a torture camp, prison, and execution center. Cambodia has a haunting physical and emotional landscape and an intangible something about these inspirational people that lures many visitors back.

The prolific and feared Khmer Angkor Empire that extended over Southeast Asia was transformed by years of civil or border wars and French protectionism. But the mother of all change was imposed by a native Khmer, Saloth Sar, better known as Pol Pot, in the name of creating an equal society.

Pol Pot led the communist Khmer Rouge who overthrew the sitting Khmer Republic and renamed the country “Democratic Kampuchea.” Within hours of victory in 1975, armed soldiers began herding the two million residents out of Phnom Penh. Pol Pot assured them they could return.

Instead, the Khmer Rouge razed Phnom Penh and other cities and towns. The residents were forced into the countryside to work collective farms up to 18 hours a day on meager rations. Villagers’ houses were burned to ensure they could not return.

Pol Pot destroyed anything that represented capitalism and prerevolutionary society, including hospitals, schools, Buddhist temples, and hotels. The goal was to return to “Year Zero” with a rice-based economy and a single agricultural class.

To that end, Pol Pot immediately murdered the educated and people who wore glasses or had a high forehead (signs of intellect). Others were imprisoned in tiny cells and tortured “to confess” to “pre-revolutionary lifestyles and crimes,” which usually included some kind of free-market activity. The reward for a “confession” was execution or life in a labor camp with “re-education.”

Ironically, in 1979 the Vietnamese freed the Cambodians from their twisted leader when they extended their border war. All told, Pol Pot killed 2 to 3 million – at least 25 percent of the population – through murder, starvation, or disease. Many of the dead were buried in some 20,000 mass graves, or “Killing Fields” all over the country where human remains still rise to the surface.

Despite the arrival of peace in 1993, Pol Pot’s legacy lives on. Fifty percent of the population is under age 25. Forty percent of people over age 40 have post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). With 95 percent of doctors and 80 percent of teachers murdered, the country is limping along to recovery with little infrastructure. Even knowing the government plays fast and loose with foreign aid, Cambodia draws more donor-based nongovernmental organizations than any other country.

Phnom Penh is growing, with new government buildings and hotels amidst the remains of once-elegant French colonial homes and burned-out buildings. Siem Reap has doubled its hotels in the last five years and boasts the best Mexican restaurant in Asia. (We preferred standard Khmer fare of rice, morning glories, and fish.)

Although medical care is free to the certifiably poor in sparsely equipped clinics, 85 percent of children are seen in five modern hospitals established by Dr. Beat Richner with private donations. His hospital in Siem Reap is flanked by 5-star hotels. People arrive on foot or 3 to a motorbike: a driver, a patient, and someone holding the IV bag. By 5 a.m., hundreds of people are queued up. Street vendors sell French bread and crepes or rice and noodles to those in line.

A written constitution, a three-branch government, and multi-party elections proved to be no guarantee of good government. Corruption, economic mismanagement, and lack of transparency have become part of the government fabric. Consequently, some Cambodians have just tuned out.

Fortunately, many people refuse to be miserable and are determined to overcome past and current abuses by their leaders. Some carry those little black and white composition books and are not shy about asking for help with their English so they can get good jobs. They have their own vision of a better life.

Pol Pot destroyed Cambodian society by promising social and economic equity. Expressing no regret, his last words were reportedly, “Everything I did, I did for my country.”


Dr. Marilyn SingletonDr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law. She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012.

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

More info about Dr. Marilyn Singleton


Warning: Government Can Be Harmful to Your Health

By Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD.

Trust in our government was a mere 19 percent in 2013 according to Pew Research Center. Not surprisingly, 56 per cent of Americans think it is not the government’s responsibility to provide a healthcare system. Waivers, favors, off-the-cuff rule changes, and the bungled launch of the Affordable Care Act website validate that distrust.  Bureaucratic incompetence and cronyism are not the only reasons we should be wary of government involvement in our medical care.

The federal government has a checkered history when it comes to medical judgments. We now cringe at the words of the revered Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the 1927 case, Buck v Bell upholding Virginia’s sterilization law for the institutionalized “feeble-minded.” “[Carrie Bell’s] welfare and that of society will be promoted by her sterilization.

It is better for all the world if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. . .Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” In fact, Carrie’s mother was a prostitute, but not feeble-minded. After Carrie’s release she maintained a job as a domestic worker and became an avid reader. Her “feeble-minded” daughter was on her school’s honor roll.

Let’s recall the appalling Tuskegee Syphilis Study lasting from 1932 to 1972.  The U.S. Public Health Service used 400 hundred mainly poor, illiterate black sharecroppers with syphilis as lab animals. They were told they had “bad blood,” but not that they were actually suffering from a serious but treatable disease. All subjects succumbed to untreated syphilis so our government could track the natural progression of the disease.

The U.S. Navy sprayed the presumably harmless bacterium, Serratia marcescens, over San Francisco in 1951 in a biological warfare test. Numerous residents contracted pneumonia-like illnesses resulting in at least one death. The experiments came to light in the 1977 Senate hearings on Health and Scientific Research. Two hundred thirty nine populated areas, including Minneapolis, St. Louis, Washington D.C.’s National Airport, and New York’s subway system, had been contaminated from 1949 to 1969 when President Nixon terminated the program.

In 1989, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-sponsored study tested an experimental measles vaccine on 1,500 six-month old Black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles. The CDC admitted in 1996 that parents were never informed that the vaccine was experimental.

According to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), lax oversight at the Stratton Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Albany, New York, allowed cancer research coordinator Paul Kornak from 1999 to 2003 to “dishonest[ly] handle research records and demonstrate a complete disregard for the well-being of vulnerable human subjects under his care.” Kornak pleaded guilty to criminally negligent homicide.

In another vein, the degree of political underpinnings in government health policies is unknown. Agencies such as the United States Preventive Services Task Force, self-described as an “independent panel of non-federal experts in prevention and evidence-based medicine,” submit recommendations to the HHS Secretary. Even assuming the recommendations are grounded in science, the Secretary is an arm of the executive branch, so in creeps politics.

This leads us to the question of whether we can always trust “evidence-based medicine.” Reporting bias is systemic in medical literature. A 2012 Cochrane independent review found that company-sponsored trials were more likely to report favorable efficacy results compared with non-industry sponsored studies.  Even in academic studies positive results are more likely to be published. A 2009 analysis of 18 surveys by multiple authors found 34 percent of researchers admitted to “questionable research practices.”

Recently, a large analysis of “secure” studies found the European guideline recommending liberal use of peri-operative beta-blockers for non-cardiac surgery in fact caused a 27 percent increase in mortality or some 800,000 deaths over 5 years. The guidelines were based on trials tainted by scientific misconduct by the principal investigator, Don Poldermans, who was also chairman of the committee that drafted the guideline.

Government intervention in medicine can be harmful to your health. Rigid rules and restrictive drug formularies are advanced based on consensus, leaving no room for individualized treatments. We want physicians whom we can trust to be open, honest critical thinkers, not “providers” who are government puppets.


Dr. Marilyn SingletonDr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law. She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012.

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

More info about Dr. Marilyn Singleton


I’m Sorry for Your Loss

By Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD.,

In Law and Order re-runs after some tragedy has occurred, prior to grilling the victim’s family the police officer quickly states the obligatory phrase, “I’m sorry for your loss.” It is sterile, meaningless, and as heartfelt as the streaming digital “Thank you” at the automated gas pump.

Fortunately, genuine compassion has been given another reprieve. Pennsylvania recently became the 37th state to enact an “apology law.” When there is an unanticipated outcome of medical care, apology laws allow physicians to express sincere feelings without fear that such expressions will be used against them in court.

These statutes range from shielding all “statements, affirmations, gestures or conduct expressing apology, fault, sympathy, commiseration, condolence, compassion or a general sense of benevolence” (Connecticut) to expressions of sympathy or benevolent gestures, i.e., “actions which convey a sense of compassion or commiseration emanating from humane impulses” (California).

Psychologists teach us that an apology is an important way of “showing respect and empathy for the wronged person.” Apologies improve patient-doctor communication and reduce patient anger. A 2010 Annals of Internal Medicine study looked at University of Michigan and Boston’s Brigham and Women’s hospitals. The study found that malpractice claims decreased by almost one half where hospitals admit and apologize for mistakes.

In an age where physicians are increasingly engrossed in compliance paperwork and have their eyes glued to the computer screen with electronic medical records, any tool that injects humanity is more than welcome. The findings in a recent paper in Journal of Hospital Medicine were telling: only 4 percent of interns practiced “etiquette-based” medicine.

Such etiquette includes (1) introducing themselves; (2) explaining their role in patient care; (3) touching their patients with a handshake, reassuring gesture, or physical exam; (4) sitting and talking with patients; and (5) asking open-ended questions to get patients to relax and talk more about themselves.

These interns are busily learning algorithms, evidence-based guidelines, and fulfilling regulatory mandates. But they will soon discover that checklists will never replace thoughtful individualized care.

A Pennsylvania community hospital Emergency Department looked at physician time usage: direct patient contact, data and order entry, discussion with colleagues, and reviewing records and test results. A whopping 43 percent of their time was spent on data entry versus 28 percent on direct patient contact.

The depersonalization of medicine is disconcerting to be sure. But it is one band on the spectrum of disconnectedness. What is more troubling is the accepted disconnection between people and facts.

At least 80 percent of the comments to the newspaper article explaining the apology law were by people tethered to their hatred. The willfully uninformed railed about how letting incompetent doctors off the hook was what we can expect from a Republican governor.

Per usual, they had not read the article. The law does not shield the physician from malpractice lawsuits; it says that compassionate statements cannot be part of the collective evidence that he breached the standard of care.

The fact is that Pennsylvania’s Democratically controlled legislature unanimously passed the law and the Republican governor signed it. I suppose haters can blow off unjustified steam and begrudge physicians the ability to express spontaneous, unrehearsed, uncalculated empathy.

Of course people reinvent the truth. We have learned from our professor-in-chief: “If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. Period.”

Well, I am sorry for our losses. I’m sorry for our loss of intelligent discussion of issues in the public forum. I’m sorry for our loss of time with patients when time is absorbed by bureaucratic red tape.

I’m sorry for our loss of patients’ full disclosure of private information for fear it will reach the government’s prying eyes. I’m sorry for your loss of choice of physicians and hospitals. I’m sorry for your loss of low-priced catastrophic insurance policies. I’m sorry for your loss of uncapped contributions to health flexible spending accounts.

I’m sorry for your loss of full-time work hours. I’m sorry that the 20 and 30-year olds who can least afford it are expected to finance healthcare. I’m sorry that the government thinks that having an insurance card equals access to care.

I’m sorry that ObamaCare true believers do not realize that there’s always free cheese in the mousetrap. Period.


Dr. Marilyn SingletonDr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law. She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012.

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

More info about Dr. Marilyn Singleton


ObamaCare Is About Your Money, Not Your Health

By Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.,

“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying all the wrong remedies.” Groucho Marx

The politics of selling the Affordable Care Act (ACA) focuses on promising health and wellness. Somehow, having “coverage” is supposed to get you to a primary care doctor, who will keep you healthy. And if he doesn’t, he will be held accountable by not being paid.

The fact is that “healthcare reform” is not going to cure America’s health problems.

Physicians, think tanks, and politicians are pointing out a myriad of problems with ACA. But most of them miss the main point, which starts with calling it “healthcare reform.” The term, and the conversation about it, conflates health care and medical care. But they are not the same thing. Individuals are in charge of their own health care. Physicians provide medical care to those who become sick.

Health reform begins with making it clear that individuals’ health is in their own hands. The relationship between personal behavior and health is clear. Almost all of the illnesses that we can prevent are related to smoking, over-eating, lack of exercise, alcohol or drug abuse, high-risk behavior, or too much sun exposure.

According to the CDC, 19 percent of all U.S. adults (43.8 million people) smoke tobacco. Almost one third of adults living below the poverty line smoke. Adverse effects include heart and vascular disease, stroke, emphysema, bronchitis, and cancer (lung, oral, esophageal, and likely bladder, kidney, and pancreas). Smoking tobacco is responsible for almost $200 billion in lost productivity and medical care expenditures per year.

Under ACA, doctors will check a box saying they asked about smoking and counseled people to quit. But the decision is up to the patient.

One third of American adults and 17 percent of children are obese. Consequences include fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, stroke, gallbladder disease, osteoarthritis, breathing problems, sleep apnea, pregnancy complications, and increased surgical risk. In 2011, the estimated annual medical care costs of obesity-related illness were nearly $200 billion, or 21 percent of annual medical spending in the United States.

Such costs are expected to rise if we allow today’s obese children to grow into obese adults. Obesity must not become the new normal. Indeed, a recent study concluded that since black women are more likely than white women to be satisfied with their weight and have less social pressure to lose weight, merely maintaining their current level of obesity was a success!

Prevention of obesity occurs at home: in the kitchen, at the dinner table, and while shopping. Not in the doctor’s office.

One-fourth of American adults don’t participate in any physical activities. Exercise can lower the risk of heart disease, stroke, dementia, colon cancer, breast cancer in post-menopausal women, and endometrial cancer.

More than half of all cancers related to lifestyle factors: 25-30 percent to tobacco, and 30-35 percent to obesity, physical inactivity, and poor nutrition. Certain cancers are related to sexually transmitted diseases such as hepatitis B, human papillomavirus infections (genital warts), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Many skin cancers are caused by sun exposure.

We will have healthier people only if patients value their own health as much as good doctors do. And doctors must practice what they preach—who is going to listen to an obese doctor or nurse?

Some patients place a higher priority on enjoying risky behavior than on their health. ACA will not make them healthy. It only shields them somewhat from the consequences of their actions by forcing people who do take care of their health to share their costs.

Government cannot make us healthy, not even by trying to prohibit overindulgence or bad habits. Certainly, ACA’s massive new regulations, erosion of privacy, and higher taxes don’t bring health. But ACA’s subsidies compound our unhealthy reliance on government.

ACA redistributes the money flowing through the system. But your health care is still your responsibility. We can make others share the health plan premiums, but the pain and suffering are still the patients’ to endure.


Dr. Marilyn SingletonDr. Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD is a board-certified anesthesiologist and member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Dr. Marilyn Singleton ran for Congress in California’s 13th District in 2012, fighting to give its 700,000 citizens the right to control their own lives.

While still working in the operating room, Dr. Marilyn Singleton attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law. She also interned at the National Health Law Program and has practiced both insurance and health law.

Dr. Marilyn Singleton has taught specialized classes dealing with issues such as the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers. She also speaks out about her concerns with Obamacare, the apology law and death panels.

Congressional candidate Dr. Marilyn Singleton presented her views on challenging the political elite to physicians at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons annual meeting in 2012.

Follow Dr. Marilyn Singleton on Twitter @MSingletonMDJD

More info about Dr. Marilyn Singleton